Where it fits
GUI-driven automation of business workflows where task completion (not partial progress) is the success criterion.
The grounding numbers: OSWorld 2.0 72.6%, and 47% faster than GPT-5.6 Sol
GPT-6: Astra scores 72.6% on OSWorld 2.0 computer-use tasks and completes computer-use tasks roughly 47% faster than its predecessor, GPT-5.6 Sol, per Artificial Analysis. Speed is the differentiated claim here more than raw accuracy.
Example prompt
Plan a desktop computer-use task that completes the following objective in a real OS environment. Identify the steps most likely to stall, and propose a recovery action for each:
[Describe the desktop task here]Ready to test the workflow?
Create account & add creditsWho should look elsewhere
A quarter of OSWorld 2.0 tasks still fail to complete end to end. Build a human checkpoint into any GUI-automation workflow before it touches anything irreversible (payments, deletions, external sends).
Recommended access
Use pay-as-you-go API credits for a controlled evaluation on your own workload and cost profile before committing production routing.
Frequently asked questions
Is GPT-6: Astra good for computer use?
GPT-6: Astra scores 72.6% on OSWorld 2.0 computer-use tasks and completes computer-use tasks roughly 47% faster than its predecessor, GPT-5.6 Sol, per Artificial Analysis. Speed is the differentiated claim here more than raw accuracy. A quarter of OSWorld 2.0 tasks still fail to complete end to end. Build a human checkpoint into any GUI-automation workflow before it touches anything irreversible (payments, deletions, external sends).
Put GPT-6: Astra to work
Fund a controlled evaluation, start with a prepared prompt, and measure quality and cost on your own workload.