Model comparison

Wan 3.0 vs Seedance 2.0: 1,240 vs 1,221 Elo

Wan 3.0 leads text-to-video at 1,240 Elo against Seedance 2.0's 1,221 and costs 34 percent less at 720p; Seedance 2.0 leads image-to-video, delivers native 4K and undercuts Wan 3.0 on its Fast tier. Pick by modality first, then by resolution.

Decision snapshot

Decision factorWan 3.0Seedance 2.0
Text-to-video Elo (Artificial Analysis, Aug 2026)1,2401,221
Image-to-video EloNot yet ranked1,191 (leads the board)
Native 4K outputNoYes
Document input (PDF, PPT)YesNo
Native audio in single passYesNo — separate TTS step
Single-pass duration ceiling30 seconds15 seconds
Per-second cost at 720p$0.10/s$0.1512/s
Open weightsNoNo

Where each model wins

  • Text-to-video prompts that need document or webpage URL context — only Wan 3.0 reads them.
  • Image-to-video and native 4K output — only Seedance 2.0.
  • 30-second single-pass generations — only Wan 3.0 (and Seedance 2.5).
  • Cheaper per-minute cost on shorter clips — Seedance 2.0.

Cost on the same workload

A 30-second 720p clip costs $3.00 on Wan 3.0 versus $4.54 on Seedance 2.0 — Wan 3.0 is about 34 percent less. Seedance 2.0's Fast tier undercuts Wan 3.0 only when you stay under 5 seconds.

Ready to test the workflow?

Create account & add credits

Workload recommendation

WorkloadRecommendation
Text-to-video with document inputWan 3.0 — only it accepts PDF, slides, webpage URLs.
30-second narrative clipWan 3.0 — double Seedance 2.0's 15-second ceiling.
Native 4K image-to-videoSeedance 2.0 — only it ships 4K in the top tier.
Cheap 5-second social teasersSeedance 2.0 — undercuts on Fast tier.
Audio-in-pass narrationWan 3.0 — Seedance 2.0 needs a separate TTS step.

Benchmark rules

  • Compare only the same Artificial Analysis harness version.
  • Label vendor-reported results separately from independent measurements.
  • Record clip duration, resolution, and audio settings alongside any score.
  • Do not infer production reliability from a single benchmark.

Frequently asked questions

Can I try Wan 3.0 before integrating it?

Use the OneInfer Wan 3.0 launcher to open a prepared prompt in the public playground. Availability is checked against the current model catalog.

How should I treat benchmark claims?

Check the provenance label and harness version. Vendor-reported and independently verified results are deliberately shown as different evidence classes.

Put Wan 3.0 to work

Fund a controlled evaluation, send a reference frame or document, and measure quality and cost on your own workload.