Gemini 3.8 Flash · Comparison

Gemini 3.8 Flash vs DeepSeek V4-Flash: cheaper isn't always cheaper

DeepSeek V4-Flash is the cheaper headline rate; Gemini 3.8 Flash wins on intelligence, multimodal input and output throughput. Run your own workload to compare cost per completed task.

Dated comparison: 3 September 2026

MetricGemini 3.8 FlashDeepSeek V4-Flash
AA Intelligence Index59Lower
Standard input / 1M (peak)$0.75$0.44
Standard input / 1M (off-peak)$0.75$0.22
Standard output / 1M$3.75Lower
ModalitiesText, image, audio, video, PDF inText in
Output speed~305 tok/sComparable
Context window1,048,576Smaller
WeightsClosedOpen

How to choose

Pick DeepSeek V4-Flash when headline per-token cost dominates and lower intelligence is acceptable. Pick Gemini 3.8 Flash when multimodal input, larger context, or higher index score justifies the per-token premium. The actual cost-per-completed-task gap depends on your workload.

Ready to test the workflow?

Create account & add credits

Comparison limits

These figures are transcribed from the 3 September 2026 research snapshot. DeepSeek V4-Flash's exact peak and off-peak windows and the comparison cohort's intelligence index should be verified before quoting.

Frequently asked questions

How current is this information?

This page uses the verified research snapshot dated 3 September 2026. Verify current access, pricing and benchmark figures before a production decision.

Put Gemini 3.8 Flash to work

Fund a controlled evaluation, send a reference frame or document, and measure quality and cost on your own workload.