Alternatives · by price and capability

Claude Fable 5.1 alternatives

Alternatives to Claude Fable 5.1 range from Claude Opus 5 at $5 per 1M input and $25 output, scoring 52.3% on Terminal-Bench 4.0, down to DeepSeek V4 Pro at $0.435 and $0.87 off-peak. Claude Opus 5 delivers more benchmark points per dollar than Claude Fable 5.1.

Closest alternatives

The closest alternative inside Anthropic's own range is Claude Opus 5 at $5 per 1M input and $25 per 1M output, which scores 52.3% on Terminal-Bench 4.0 against 55.8% for Fable 5.1 and therefore delivers more benchmark points per dollar. Outside Anthropic, GPT-5.6 Sol is the only model Anthropic benchmarked directly. For teams optimising on cost rather than peak capability, open-weight models with 1M-token context windows serve much of the same workload.

ModelInput $/1MOutput $/1MContextRoutable via OneInferTerminal-Bench 4.0
Claude Opus 5$5.00$25.001MYes52.3%
Claude Sonnet 5$2.00$10.00Yesnot published
GPT-5.6 Sol$5.00$30.00No37.3%
Kimi K3$3.00$15.001MYesnot published
GLM-5.3$1.40$4.40Yesnot published
DeepSeek V4 Pro$0.435$0.87 off-peakYesnot published

Open-weight alternatives

Open-weight alternatives to Claude Fable 5.1 include Kimi K3 at 2.8 trillion parameters with a 1M-token context and DeepSeek V4 Pro under the MIT licence on its prior checkpoint. Claude Fable 5.1 has no open-weight equivalent. Frame these as substitutes for the workload, not equivalents for the model.

Ready to test the workflow?

Create account & add credits

When not to switch

If your workload re-reads a large cached prefix (long-running agents, multi-turn coding), Claude Fable 5.1 wins on cost. If your workload is short, single-turn, and cache-light, Claude Opus 5 or Kimi K3 deliver comparable quality at half the price. If you need peak capability on agentic scientific research, Claude Fable 5.1 is the only Anthropic model that published scores above 50% on Terminal-Bench-Science 0.1.

Frequently asked questions

What are the alternatives to Claude Fable 5.1?

The closest alternative inside Anthropic's own range is Claude Opus 5 at $5 per 1M input and $25 per 1M output. Outside Anthropic, GPT-5.6 Sol is the only model Anthropic benchmarked directly. For teams optimising on cost rather than peak capability, Kimi K3 at $3 and $15 per 1M, GLM-5.3 at $1.40 and $4.40, and DeepSeek V4 Pro at $0.435 and $0.87 off-peak all serve much of the same workload.

Put Claude Fable 5.1 to work

Fund a controlled evaluation, start with a prepared prompt, and measure quality and cost on your own workload.